Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Glowing night | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play is slightly better than vivo NEX 3, with a 77.4 score against 73.9. Moto Z2 Play's design is way lighter and thinner than vivo NEX 3, although it was released many years before. Motorola Moto Z2 Play and vivo NEX 3 have incredibly similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Vivo NEX 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM memory.
The vivo NEX 3 features a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Vivo NEX 3 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.