Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Glowing night | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 is a little bit better than vivo NEX 3, with a global score of 77.6 against 73.9. The Motorola Moto Z3 design is noticeably thinner and much lighter than the vivo NEX 3, even though it was released a little bit over a year before. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
The Moto Z3 has a bit more vivid display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display pixel density. The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a better memory for applications and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The vivo NEX 3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM memory. The vivo NEX 3 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo NEX 3 also has a much bigger sensor capturing way better quality photos, a way more MP camera in the back and a bigger aperture.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.