Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Glowing night | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has a general score of 78.5, which is a bit better than the vivo NEX 3's general score of 73.9. Even when the Motorola One Action and the vivo NEX 3 were released with only a few months difference, the Motorola One Action is just a little thinner and lighter. Vivo NEX 3 has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Motorola One Action features a little bit better display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a quite better pixel count per screen inch. The Motorola One Action counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with longer battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29% more battery size. Vivo NEX 3 has a much better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also has a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.