Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Glowing night | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the vivo NEX 3, getting a 79.8 score against 73.9. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola One Hyper has the older 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola One Hyper construction is a bit thinner and a little lighter than vivo NEX 3, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
The vivo NEX 3 and the Motorola One Hyper count with really similar screens, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a bit higher screen pixel density. The Motorola One Hyper features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The vivo NEX 3 features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo NEX 3 features a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and the same resolution camera, the vivo NEX 3 also has a bigger aperture.
The vivo NEX 3 has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.