Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Glowing night | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is slightly better than the vivo NEX 3, having an 80.7 score against 73.9. The Motorola One Vision is a somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than the vivo NEX 3, even though they were released with only a few months difference. Motorola One Vision features just a bit better looking screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520px.
The Motorola One Vision has a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo NEX 3 has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The vivo NEX 3 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a larger sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos and a back camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 29 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.