Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Glowing night | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has an overall score of 80, which is a bit better than the vivo NEX 3's score of 73.9. Motorola One Zoom is a a little bit thinner and lighter cellphone than vivo NEX 3, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference. The Motorola One Zoom and vivo NEX 3 both count with quite similar displays, because although the Motorola One Zoom has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite greater pixels count per inch in the screen.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has 4 GB more RAM. The vivo NEX 3 has a slightly better camera than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with a slightly better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo NEX 3 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.