Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Glowing night | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than vivo NEX 3, having a global score of 87 against 73.9. The Motorola razr (2020) body is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than vivo NEX 3. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Vivo NEX 3 has a slightly better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a just a little lower pixels count per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2256 resolution and a little bigger display. The Motorola razr (2020) and vivo NEX 3 have similar storage to store more apps and games, they have the same internal storage capacity.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola razr (2020). Both of them have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Vivo NEX 3 features a superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh. The vivo NEX 3 has a little bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a back camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.