Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Glowing night | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| P-OLED | LTPO |
| 362 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a global score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than the vivo NEX 3's overall score of 73.9. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s design is noticeably newer, a little bit lighter and a lot thinner than vivo NEX 3. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has 15 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The vivo NEX 3 features a much better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. The vivo NEX 3 has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo NEX 3 features a slightly better camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a bit superior battery performance than vivo NEX 3, because it has a 4 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.