Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Glowing night | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the vivo NEX 3, getting a 79.9 score against 73.9. These phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit lighter and thinner than vivo NEX 3.
Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite greater pixels density. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little longer battery performance than vivo NEX 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Vivo NEX 3 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also has a way bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.