Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | -- |
| Glowing night | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is better than vivo NEX 3, having an 82 score against 73.9. Galaxy A32 LTE Only's design is newer, somewhat thinner and notably lighter than the vivo NEX 3. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the previous 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The vivo NEX 3 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A32 LTE Only features just a bit better display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel amount in each inch of display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a bit longer battery life than vivo NEX 3, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
The vivo NEX 3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a 64 MP camera and a F1.8 aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also has a lot better video resolution and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.