Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Glowing night | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 has a general score of 81.7, which is much better than the vivo NEX 3's global score of 73.9. Even when the Galaxy A41 and the vivo NEX 3 were released only 8 months apart, the Galaxy A41 is somewhat thinner and notably lighter. These devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy A41 has the previous 11 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A41 features a little sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit better pixels density.
Vivo NEX 3 has more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo NEX 3 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also has a bigger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality, a larger aperture to capture better photos in low light environments and a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The vivo NEX 3 features improved battery performance than Galaxy A41, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.