Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 score. Even when the Galaxy A50 and vivo NEX 3 were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy A50 is thinner and much lighter. Galaxy A50 has a bit better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo NEX 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Vivo NEX 3 features just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 13% more battery capacity. The vivo NEX 3 shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.