Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Glowing night | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 global score. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has 10 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy A50s construction is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than vivo NEX 3, even though both were released only a couple of months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little greater screen pixel density. The Galaxy A50s has a slightly better memory for games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Vivo NEX 3 features a bit better processor than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo NEX 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The vivo NEX 3 features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Vivo NEX 3 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the vivo NEX 3 also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.