Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Glowing night | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than vivo NEX 3's overall score of 73.9. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a somewhat lighter and a bit thinner cellphone than vivo NEX 3, although both were released with only a couple of months difference.
Vivo NEX 3 has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite higher display density.
The vivo NEX 3 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the vivo NEX 3 also has a bigger camera sensor, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a much more MP camera. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with more memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a battery performance that's just as good as the vivo NEX 3 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.