Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glowing night | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the vivo NEX 3, with a score of 90.7 against 73.9. The Galaxy A52 design is newer, thinner and lighter than vivo NEX 3. The vivo NEX 3 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A52 features a bit sharper screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit better pixel amount in each inch in the screen. The Galaxy A52 has a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a camera that's just as good as the vivo NEX 3 one, both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rates, the same resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a battery performance that is very similar to the vivo NEX 3 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.