Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glowing night | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the vivo NEX 3, having a score of 91.3 against 73.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy A52 5G's body is newer, thinner and lighter than vivo NEX 3.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a little more vivid display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Vivo NEX 3 has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a camera that is just as good as vivo NEX 3's camera, they have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same 3840x2160 video definition, a 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a same size camera aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and vivo NEX 3 count with similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.