Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glowing night | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is a lot better than vivo NEX 3, having a 91.1 score against 73.9. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A52s is a newer phone, and it is also lighter and thinner than vivo NEX 3.
Vivo NEX 3 features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little sharper screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Galaxy A52s features a camera that is just as good as vivo NEX 3's camera, both have a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same aperture, a 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the same video quality and the same video frame rates. Samsung Galaxy A52s has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The vivo NEX 3 and the Samsung Galaxy A52s feature extremely similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.