Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A6 has a score of 75.8, which is a bit better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy A6 is older than the vivo NEX 3, it's body is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter. Vivo NEX 3 features a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM.
The vivo NEX 3 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A6, because it has a larger display, a little higher display pixels density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2256px. Vivo NEX 3 has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo NEX 3 has a greater camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a way more megapixels camera in the back and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 has a superior battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.