Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is slightly better than vivo NEX 3, getting a global score of 76.9 against 73.9. Galaxy A70's body is lighter and thinner than vivo NEX 3, even when both were released only 5 months apart. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Vivo NEX 3 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo NEX 3 and Samsung Galaxy A70 have quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A70 has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The vivo NEX 3 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A70 has a battery duration that's very similar to the battery duration in vivo NEX 3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.