Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Glowing night | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is much better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 score. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 has 11 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A71 is a lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than vivo NEX 3, although both were released only a couple months apart.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a screen that's very similar to the screen in vivo NEX 3, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels count in each screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM.
Galaxy A71 features a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 features a battery duration that's very similar to the vivo NEX 3 one.
Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a little bit better camera than vivo NEX 3. They have the same sensor size, a F1.8 aperture, a camera in the back with a 64 megapixels, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.