Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Glowing night | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a global score of 85.2, which is better than the vivo NEX 3's global score of 73.9. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy F41 has older 11 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy F41's design is newer, just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than vivo NEX 3.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a little bit better screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixels density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. Vivo NEX 3 counts with more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy F41, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The vivo NEX 3 has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy F41 and vivo NEX 3 both have extremely similar cameras, they have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality, a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 features superior battery duration than vivo NEX 3, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.