Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Glowing night | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than the vivo NEX 3, with an 88.1 score against 73.9. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than the vivo NEX 3, but they are equally thin.
The vivo NEX 3 has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. Galaxy F62 features a bit more vivid screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62. Both of them have a F1.8 aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition, a 0.59 inches sensor and a 64 MP resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy F62 counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery life than vivo NEX 3, because it has a 56 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.