Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Glowing night | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is way better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 global score. Both phones in this review include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system). Although the Samsung Galaxy Fold and the vivo NEX 3 were released only 0 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Fold body is a lot heavier but thinner.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a processing unit that is very similar to vivo NEX 3's CPU, and although the Galaxy Fold has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Fold features a screen that is just as good as the display in vivo NEX 3, and although the Galaxy Fold has a little bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1536 x 2152 resolution, they both have a greater count of pixels per display inch.
The vivo NEX 3 features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Galaxy Fold has much more storage capacity for apps and games than vivo NEX 3, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo NEX 3 features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.