Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Glowing night | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has a global score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than vivo NEX 3's overall score of 73.9. Galaxy M20's construction is lighter and a bit thinner than the vivo NEX 3, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M20 has the previous 10 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy M20 features a screen that is very similar to the display in vivo NEX 3, because although the Samsung Galaxy M20 has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little better pixel amount in each display inch.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than vivo NEX 3, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a way higher resolution camera, a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a way better video quality and a larger aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.