Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 362 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is better than the vivo NEX 3's general score of 73.9. Samsung Galaxy M51 is a a little lighter device than the vivo NEX 3, but both of them have the same thickness. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy M51 has a display that is very similar to vivo NEX 3's screen, because although the Galaxy M51 has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a bit better display density. Vivo NEX 3 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The vivo NEX 3 takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same resolution camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a really longer battery performance than vivo NEX 3, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.