Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Glowing night | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is way better than the vivo NEX 3's overall score of 73.9. The Galaxy Note 20 design is newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than vivo NEX 3. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a processing unit that's just as good as the vivo NEX 3 one, both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater display density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The vivo NEX 3 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also has a lot more MP back-facing camera, a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and faster video frame rate.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The vivo NEX 3 features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.