Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Glowing night | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the vivo NEX 3, having a 98.9 score against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer device, and it is also thinner and a bit lighter than vivo NEX 3. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better processing power than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better camera than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way larger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures, a lot better video definition and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery lifetime is just as good as the vivo NEX 3 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.