Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is a bit better than the vivo NEX 3's overall score of 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition design is somewhat thinner and notably lighter than vivo NEX 3, even though it was released many years before. Vivo NEX 3 has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel density. Vivo NEX 3 counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo NEX 3 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera and a much bigger sensor.
The vivo NEX 3 features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.