Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Glowing night | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite has an overall score of 86.2, which is much better than the vivo NEX 3's global score of 73.9. The Galaxy Note10 Lite body is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the vivo NEX 3, even though both were released only a couple months apart. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has an older 11 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution. The vivo NEX 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM.
The vivo NEX 3 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a greater storage for apps and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a battery lifetime that's very similar to vivo NEX 3's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.