Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 score. Even though Galaxy Note3 is much older than the vivo NEX 3, it's body is thinner and way lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note3 has the previous 4.4.2 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM memory. Vivo NEX 3 has a bit better screen than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little worse pixels quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2256px resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo NEX 3 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light situations, a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The vivo NEX 3 features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Vivo NEX 3 features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.