Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Glowing night | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is much better than vivo NEX 3, getting a general score of 88.3 against 73.9. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has older 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S10's design is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than the vivo NEX 3, although they were released with only 6 months difference.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S10. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a sharper screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a lot higher screen density.
The vivo NEX 3 shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The vivo NEX 3 features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 32 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.