Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Glowing night | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is way better than vivo NEX 3, having a 93.6 score against 73.9. These devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S10 5G design is just a bit lighter and thinner than the vivo NEX 3, even when both of them were only released 4 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution. The vivo NEX 3 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S10 5G. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as vivo NEX 3, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy S10 5G has a battery life that's just as good as the battery life in vivo NEX 3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.