Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Glowing night | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is a lot better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than the vivo NEX 3, although they were released with only 5 months difference. The vivo NEX 3 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S10 Lite. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a slightly better display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixels number per screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos, a much more megapixels camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite's battery lifetime is very similar to vivo NEX 3's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.