Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Glowing night | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 general score. The Galaxy S10e body is thinner and a lot lighter than vivo NEX 3, although both of them were released with only 6 months difference. The vivo NEX 3 has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo NEX 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display and a little higher 1080 x 2280px resolution. Vivo NEX 3 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera and a much bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Vivo NEX 3 features a much better battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 45% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.