Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Glowing night | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is a lot better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 overall score. The Galaxy S20 FE is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than vivo NEX 3. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Vivo NEX 3 has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM.
The vivo NEX 3 features a much better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a way more MP back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features more memory for apps and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE's battery life is just as good as the vivo NEX 3 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.