Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Glowing night | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than vivo NEX 3, having a 98 score against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is a bit heavier but a bit thinner than the vivo NEX 3, and both were released with only 6 months difference. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's CPU is very similar to the vivo NEX 3 one, and although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper display than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a much better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better battery life than vivo NEX 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.