Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Glowing night | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is a lot better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 score. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S22 body is noticeably newer, thinner and noticeably lighter than vivo NEX 3.
The Galaxy S22 features a much sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels count in each inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340. The vivo NEX 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S22. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has just a bit better camera than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a way lower 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a lot better video resolution and a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
Vivo NEX 3 features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo NEX 3 features greater battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 22 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.