Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Glowing night | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the vivo NEX 3, having a 95.4 score against 73.9. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is extremely newer and a little bit thinner than the vivo NEX 3's, but it is also just a little heavier. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Vivo NEX 3 has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a better screen pixels density.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior camera than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much higher video definition, a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more MP back-facing camera. Vivo NEX 3 counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better battery duration than vivo NEX 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.