Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-16 | -- |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.71 ounces | -- |
| Glowing night | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is much better than vivo NEX 3's global score of 73.9. The Galaxy S25 is a thinner and extremely lighter phone than vivo NEX 3. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has 14 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a way better looking screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit better pixels count per screen inch. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM.
The vivo NEX 3 has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo NEX 3 has a little better battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity. Galaxy S25 has a slightly better camera than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a way higher video definition and a bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.