Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is slightly better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S7 is incredibly older than the vivo NEX 3, it's construction is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a way higher pixel count per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The vivo NEX 3 has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S7, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The vivo NEX 3 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The vivo NEX 3 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos and a camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.