Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is a little bit better than vivo NEX 3, getting a score of 78.1 against 73.9. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S7 edge is an much older cellphone than the vivo NEX 3, but it's way lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
Vivo NEX 3 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a bit more vivid screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera in the back with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
The vivo NEX 3 has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo NEX 3 has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.