Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Glowing night | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 global score. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a newer phone than vivo NEX 3, although it's a bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has 12 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has 2 GB more RAM. The vivo NEX 3 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2256 and a quite lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The vivo NEX 3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also has a way bigger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Vivo NEX 3 features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.