Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 362 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than the vivo NEX 3, with an 80.1 score against 73.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device than the vivo NEX 3, it must be told that it is also thicker and heavier. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the older 8.0 Oreo version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way greater pixel number per screen inch. Vivo NEX 3 features a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo NEX 3 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery life is just as good as the vivo NEX 3 one. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a lot larger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality and a camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.