Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glowing night | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than the vivo NEX 3's global score of 73.9. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy Z Flip is a lighter and extremely thinner phone than the vivo NEX 3, even though both of them were released with only a couple months difference.
Galaxy Z Flip's processor is very similar to the processing unit in vivo NEX 3, they have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little more vivid screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little bit better number of pixels in each inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and vivo NEX 3 have similar storage capacity for games and applications, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The vivo NEX 3 captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor.
The vivo NEX 3 has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.