Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glowing night | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than vivo NEX 3, with a overall score of 92.3 against 73.9. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and way thinner than the vivo NEX 3.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a little better hardware performance than vivo NEX 3. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite better display pixels density.
Vivo NEX 3 has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
The vivo NEX 3 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G count with incredibly similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have the same internal memory capacity. The vivo NEX 3 features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.