Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Glowing night | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the vivo NEX 3, with a global score of 94.6 against 73.9. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much heavier than the vivo NEX 3, it's thinner and newer.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little more vivid display than vivo NEX 3, because it has a bit bigger display, a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a bit higher pixel density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better performance than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The vivo NEX 3 features a better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much more MP back camera and a bigger sensor. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's memory to store more apps and games is just as good as the vivo NEX 3 one, they have the same internal memory capacity.
Vivo NEX 3 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 count with really similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.