Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-05-22 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.54 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black and Purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia 1 II is a lot better than vivo NEX 3, with a score of 91 against 73.9. Xperia 1 II's design is somewhat thinner and lighter than vivo NEX 3, even though both of them were released with only 8 months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia 1 II has the older 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Vivo NEX 3 has a bit superior CPU than Xperia 1 II. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Xperia 1 II counts with a better looking screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixel density and a way better 1644 x 3840 resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 has a superior camera than Xperia 1 II, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a 0.59 inches sensor, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back. The Sony Xperia 1 II counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory, the Sony Xperia 1 II also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The vivo NEX 3 has just a bit longer battery life than Xperia 1 II, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.