Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-01-26 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia PRO is way better than the vivo NEX 3, with a global score of 94.3 against 73.9. Xperia PRO's design is newer, but a little heavier and a bit thicker than vivo NEX 3. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Xperia PRO has older 10 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with a little better performance than Xperia PRO. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Xperia PRO features a sharper screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1644 x 3840 and a way better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The vivo NEX 3 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Sony Xperia PRO, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Sony Xperia PRO features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit better battery duration than Xperia PRO, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.