Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Glowing night | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a general score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than vivo NEX 3's overall score of 73.9. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the TCL 20 Pro 5G has 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. TCL 20 Pro 5G's body is newer, lighter and just a little thinner than vivo NEX 3.
Vivo NEX 3 features a little faster processing unit than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo NEX 3 also has 2 GB more RAM. TCL 20 Pro 5G and vivo NEX 3 have extremely similar displays, because although the TCL 20 Pro 5G has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The vivo NEX 3 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger back camera sensor.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. TCL 20 Pro 5G's battery life is very similar to the vivo NEX 3 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.