Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Glowing night | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a score of 86.6, which is much better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the previous 10 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is an a little thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than vivo NEX 3.
The vivo NEX 3 has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 3. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a bit better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel count in each inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 takes a bit better videos and photos than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same resolution back camera, the same back camera sensor size and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has higher video frame rates.
The vivo NEX 3 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than vivo NEX 3, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.